Sala de Prensa

119
Septiembre 2009
Año XI, Vol. 5

WEB PARA PROFESIONALES DE LA COMUNICACION IBEROAMERICANOS

A R T I C U L O S

   


Editorial ethics for Twitter journalists

David Brewer *

Editorial ethics of balance, impartiality, fairness, objectivity and accuracy are at the heart of all good journalism. Without these values, some so-called journalists will be pumping out PR and propaganda. But with so many journalists in traditional media now invading the social networking space and using tools such as Twitter to both find stories and to spread stories, how do editorial ethics stand up in this fast-paced, instant-information world?

Ethics for Twitter journalists

The great thing about Twitter is the speed of delivery and publication. It was set up so that people could answer the question “What are you doing?” in a 140 character text message, sent from either a mobile device or a computer.

It's instant and it is focused. The message is not drowned in unnecessary words. People using Twitter for sending news have to be disciplined. It's ideal for news headlines. Short, sharp and to the point.

The information atmosphere is now thick with tweets with a richness of subject variety that is often leaving the mainstream media behind.

Some are fairly basic (although no less important for those sending and receiving) such as, “I have had a bad day” and “taking the dog for a walk”, but others, as we have seen in the recent tweeting around the situation in Iran #iranelections , have been stunning in their delivery of information that may not otherwise have been circulated.

I now consult my Tweet Deck before I consult my old favourite news bookmarks.

Is the information trustworthy?

More and more journalists are using Twitter as part of their newsgathering process . There are still those who dismiss it as a distraction, irrelevance or something for kids, but many are now embracing it, because they know it connects them with their audience and offers them tips and leads that are often ahead of the wires.

So, what about Twitter ethics for journalists? Are these any different from traditional editorial ethics?

I would argue not; the only thing that has changed is the conduit/platform.

Journalism remains the same and is based on balanced, impartial, objective, fair and accurate reporting that reaches the whole audience and represents all significant voices regardless of race, religion or financial status.

High-level look at some of the ethical issues

  • Accuracy: Well-sourced information based on solid evidence,
  • Impartiality: Fair and open-minded coverage exploring all significant views,
  • Fairness: Transparent, open, honest and fair coverage based on straight-dealing,
  • Offence: Delivering challenging journalism that is sensitive to audience expectations,
  • Integrity: Dealing with groups keen to use the media for their own advantage,
  • Privacy: To be respected and not invaded unless it is in the public interest.

Accuracy

A journalist will always be judged on the accuracy and reliability of the journalism s/he produces. It must be:

  • well sourced
  • supported by strong evidence
  • examined and tested
  • clear and unambiguous.

The journalist tweeting doesn’t have to have the whole story, but they need to be totally transparent in making clear the difference between verified fact and rumour and speculation.

The bottom line is that journalists should not deal in rumour and speculation. Others tweeting can, but a journalist should not.

Impartiality

Being impartial means not being prejudiced towards, or against, any particular side, and to be fair and balanced.

This is a tough one. How is that achieved in a tweet of 140 characters?

The main thing is that, as you uncover different facts and piece them together, you aim to cover the whole story with all perspectives explored. So, if you are restricted to 140 characters you are going to have to string together several tweets .

If you can bring all the facts together in an online article and provide a link, all the better. If not, try re-tweeting the additional information. Perhaps let those following you know that you will update with more information soon and include more perspectives/opinions.

Only by reflecting the diversity of opinion fairly and accurately can we hope to offer a true picture of what is really happening.

All journalists have their own views, and yet to deliver comprehensive and authoritative coverage of news and current affairs they must rise above their own personal perspective.

This is particularly true with controversial issues. Here, particularly, journalists need to be objective and impartial and keep their own opinions firmly under wraps. Impartiality means:

  • provide a balance of issues and views
  • reflect a wide range of opinion
  • explore conflicting views
  • ensure no significant strand of thought is under represented.

In terms of editorial freedom, journalists should be free to:

  • cover any subject if there are good editorial reasons for doing so
  • report on a specific aspect of an issue
  • provide an opportunity for a single view to be expressed
  • avoid bias or an imbalance of views
  • cover stories that might offend part of the audience
  • be fair with contributors and let them respond to our questions.

Fairness

Journalists must always aim to be fair, honest and straightforward with everyone they come in contact with, particularly contributors and the audience.

So when we tweet we should seek out opinions from those who may hold opposing views and perspectives and offer them the opportunity to comment and be prepared to tweet that, too.

We should always offer the right of reply when making allegations.

Offence

Journalism that is rigorous, robust and searching may occasionally offend parts of the audience. The same is true with tweets.

The bottom line is that journalists must ensure that the material they cover has a clear editorial purpose. However, journalists need to be careful that offence is not used to prevent them from digging for stories.

Just because someone is offended doesn't mean the topic should not be investigated. You can't keep everyone happy, and neither should you try to do so.

Integrity

Editorial integrity should be the heart of all journalism. Without integrity your journalism is untrustworthy and suspect. The same goes for the Twitter journalist.

Integrity affects every area of a news organisation from senior management to the most lowly job. It gives you the authority to investigate and dig where others don't; without integrity you can't do this.

Without integrity, journalism because malleable and easy to manipulate, and there are many cases where that is apparent in today's media.

To stand apart and to inform the public debate with crisp, rigorous journalism, you need integrity. In editorial terms it means the following:

  • to be independent of both state and partisan interests
  • to not endorse or appear to endorse any organisation, its products, activities or services
  • to not give undue prominence to commercial products or services
  • to not unduly promote our own media organisation
  • to be a rigorous in our coverage of our media businesses dealings as we are with others.

Privacy

Journalists face a difficult balancing act. They must respect privacy but they must also be robust in their investigation into issues that are in the public interest.

This will mean that in some cases it will be necessary for a journalist to carry out an investigation that interferes with someone’s privacy. Such cases could include:

  • crime and anti-social behaviour
  • corruption or injustice
  • incompetence or neglect
  • public health and safety
  • misleading public statements
  • political statements.

The most important rule is that we must treat people fairly and with respect.

We must also be clear about our own motives. We must have no personal interest in an investigation that invades a person’s privacy. The only justification is that it is in the public interest and we are genuinely attempting to shine a light on wrongdoing.

Summing up

To sum up, the fact that a tweet by a journalist is restricted to 140 characters does not mean that journalistic ethics can be ditched.

If traditional, mainstream media is to contribute to this fast-evolving communication network it needs to carry with it the values that have underpinned journalism through its many previous evolutionary stages.

The platforms and conduits change, but journalist must remain true to editorial values adjusted only to reflect societal developments.


* David Brewer es un periodista británico que ha sido managing editor en CNN.com Europa, Medio Este y África; managing editor de BBC News Online y editor de BBC Regional Political Unit. Este texto lo publicó en su blog Media Helping Media, el pasado 28 de junio.


Tus comentarios, sugerencias y aportaciones
nos permitirán seguir construyendo este sitio.
¡Colabora!



| Volver a la página principal de SdP |
|
Acerca de SdP | Periodismo de Investigación | Etica y Deontología |
|
Derecho de la Información | Fuentes de Investigación |
|
Política y gobierno | Comunicación Social | Economía y Finanzas |
|
Academia | Fotoperiodismo | Medios en Línea | Bibliotecas |
|
Espacio del Usuario | Alta en SdP |
|
SdP: Tu página de inicio | Vínculos a SdP | Informes |
|
Indice de Artículos | Indice de Autores |
|
Búsqueda en Sala de Prensa |
|
Fotoblog |

© Sala de Prensa 1997 - 2009


IMPORTANTE: Todos los materiales que aparecen en Sala de Prensa están protegidos por las leyes del Copyright.

SdP no sería posible sin la colaboración de una serie de profesionales y académicos que generosamente nos han enviado artículos, ponencias y ensayos, o bien han autorizado la reproducción de sus textos; algunos de los cuales son traducciones libres. Por supuesto, SdP respeta en todo momento las leyes de propiedad intelectual, y en estas páginas aparecen detallados los datos relativos al copyright -si lo hubiera-, independientemente del copyright propio de todo el material de Sala de Prensa. Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos de Sala de Prensa sin la autorización expresa del Consejo Editorial. Los textos firmados son responsabilidad de su autor y no reflejan necesariamente el criterio institucional de SdP. Para la reproducción de material con copyright propio es necesaria, además, la autorización del autor y/o editor original.